This is an interesting question. One thing - and I'm not sure a check could check for this - that I find occasionally is different SMF intervals on different systems. If they're related (as in collected into the same performance database) summarisation can be difficult.
Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: [email protected] Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: Elardus Engelbrecht <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 27/01/2015 14:03 Subject: Re: Health Checker and SMF Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> Peter Relson wrote: >>I see no SMF Health checks. >What SMF Health checks do you want to see? I'm not sure if my earlier post in this thread reached you (perhaps it freezed in that freeze storm), but I repeat it here: I think I should have added that I want Health Checker to check for SMF recommended options, record selections, interval and so on. Say, is 30 minutes interval is good/bad/ugly? Or not collecting SMF records 30 or 80 at all, is a real bad thing. Or you have only ONE MANx dataset and so on. Something like that above - highligthing non-recommended options used or made active. TIA! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
