On Jan 22, 2015 4:53 PM, "Charles Mills" <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > > Ah, thanks. I keep forgetting that. Oddly named manual, IMHO. > > Anyway, I don't think I have a CIB. I think this condition is totally internal to C++ -- not an LE "condition."
Please take at least a quick look at the le manuals. As you know the c/c++ stack is implemented on top of le. Also le implements a full set of try/catch semantic that work across le enabled languages. The c/c++ try/catch may be built on top of that. > > Charles > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Sam Siegel > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:52 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: In C++ any way to get traceback info in a catch()? > > On Jan 22, 2015 3:26 PM, "Charles Mills" <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > > > > Don, thanks. To clarify, there is no ABEND type condition. The > > exception > in > > questions is "out of storage" -- bad_alloc. > > > > Where is "machine block" documented or defined? cib_machine is a void*. > > > > Look in LE vendor interface manual for all of the LE control blocks. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
