This could then be a problem for me. The LSPR link has the smallest 2964-401 with 1 CP and 31 MSU My current z9-L03 is 28 MSU, but I am capping at 16. But my major vendor (SAG) doesn't accept subcapacity. And, I was seriously "burnt" when we last had a uniprocessor. The smallest multi is 60 MSU
My thoughts lately have been that our prepaid maintenance on the z9 would be expiring about the same timeframe as a zNext-BC > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Phil Smith III > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:27 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: z13 unanswered question. > > Notwithstanding the BC/Bitcoin humor, no, IBM said there will be no EC/BC > distinction. Part of this announcement is simplification-no EC/BC, no "System > z" vs. "zEnterprise". This is a good thing. > > > > Now if IBM can just get people to stop saying "zSeries" (now dead for a > decade!). Of course, there are still IBMers with "zSeries" in their titles, > including folks in sales. Pretty sad.back in the day, the IBM branding police > would have had those folks executed! > > > > (I noticed that several of the IBM releases yesterday still said "zNext" in a > few > places-somebody didn't do a good job of updating after the name got > finalized.) > > > > .phsiii > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
