are folks still using LNKLSTxx? Nope Dana
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DYNAMIC... BENOIT, ROY F.
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DYNAMIC... R.S.
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DYNAMIC... Thomas Conley
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DY... Peter Relson
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMA... J O Skip Robinson
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF F... Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DYNAMIC... Ed Gould
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DY... Chase, John
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DYNAMIC... Elardus Engelbrecht
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DYNAMIC... Dana Mitchell
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DYNAMIC... Peter Relson
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DY... Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DY... van der Grijn, Bart (B)
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMA... John Gilmore
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF F... J O Skip Robinson
- Re: PROGxx vs LNKLSTxx, and APF FORMAT(DYNAMIC... Peter Relson
