Sam Siegel wrote: >Look at the assembler service guide. Dynalloc () is just a wrapper which >calls svc99.
Right...we know that. Of course SVC 99 supports this; the question was: >Does anyone know whether dynalloc() supports FREE=CLOSE,SPIN=UNALLOC? So I guess we're confused by your answer. ...phsiii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
