In <[email protected]>, on 07/29/2014
at 04:27 PM, Phil Smith III <[email protected]> said:
>I guess I'm confused, Shmuel-are you contending that because many
>web sites suck, it's OK for the SHARE site to suck?
Not even close; I'm contending that because the majority of web sites
suck, the poor design is no proof of a desire to exclude outsiders.
>Or, based on the reference to Gresham, should we take it that you
>are hoping that SHARE goes away?
Only if you have a truly bizarre imagination.
>I'm really not sure what you're trying to say!
I'm trying to say that extraordinary claims require extraordinary
proofs. Sometimes a bad web site is only a bad web site, not proof of
a conspiracy.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
