On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:50:40 -0500, Ed Gould wrote: > >Think about it a little bit and you can come up easily with a reason. > Nope. I'll need help on that. I've noticed it for a few years and got no ideas.
>On Jul 10, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >> Be careful; that's "FILE IN USE"; not "DATA SET IN USE". >> >> This is a good time to wonder why SMP/E uses its own DDNAME schema, >> rather than just letting DYNALLOC pick a unique SYSnnnnn name. I suppose >> it can be informative when the question arises, "Who allocated that >> thing, anyway!?" Thanks, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
