On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:47:27 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote: > >I recommend new exploiters of 'CSA' - regardless of expected size >requirement - consider placing their common storage above the bar in >order to eliminate such questions and considerations altogether. VSCR is >always a good thing... > As is keeping yourself off the list of "the usual suspects".
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:28:24 -0700, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote: >On 6/29/2014 5:54 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:06:59 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote: >>> >>> A documented change in macro IARST64 ca. March 2007: > >I remember that well. Craddock and Bob Rogers were dead set against the >idea - arguing that explicit HV memory sharing would be a better >architectural direction than HV common, but were eventually overruled by >Elpida and others within IBM who were dealing with the practicalities of >trying to convert existing code from 31-bit to 64-bit... > How does this fit with POSIX shared memory? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
