Making life easier for programmers is not the operating system's prime 
directive. It has other things to worry about like being secure and staying up. 
:-)

> On 27 Jun 2014, at 17:18, "MichealButz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Rob
> With all due to respect and I mean that sincerely I have number of TSO
> commands that would make life easier it boggles my mind that because I am
> authorized I can't use them
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Rob Scott
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: IKJTSOxx Auth pgm cmds PC rtns
> 
> It is well documented in the TSO manuals that IKEFTSR will not allow
> authorized programs to issue unauthorized commands.
> 
> All authorized command/program activity in TSO runs under a parallel
> authorized TMP jobstep - running commands and programs that were not
> designed (or tested) to be invoked authorized is an obvious integrity
> exposure.
> 
> As far as NOWTPMSG, it might be useful to investigate if it is *supported*
> to change the UPT settings manually - see UPTWTP and UPTNCOM in IKJUPT.  
> 
> Rob Scott
> Lead Developer
> Rocket Software
> 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> Email: [email protected]
> Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of MichealButz
> Sent: 27 June 2014 16:29
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: IKJTSOxx Auth pgm cmds PC rtns
> 
> Why cant I issue simple TSO command via IKJEFTSR because my code is
> authorized I don't understand the idea behind it
> 
> I would like to keep everything local to my TSO address space I am not
> trying to do anything kooky I have a recovery rtn and MVS message interfere
> with it so I am just trying to do PROFILE NOWTMSG
> 
> I don't understand why TCAS doesn't let me do it
> 
> But maybe there is a good reason
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Rob Scott
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:22 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: IKJTSOxx Auth pgm cmds PC rtns
> 
> If you have a PC-owning service-providing server address space, then you
> could probably dispense with AUTHPGM/CMD/TSF entries completely and keep
> your client code in normal problem state key 8.
> 
> Your non-auth client can ask the server address space to perform any
> authorized functions on its behalf and communicate via some sort of request
> queue and SUSPEND/RESUME logic.   
> 
> Attempting to turn your TSO user address space into a PC-owning
> service-providing address space to circumvent authority issues is an idea
> that is so bad it defies description - please say that you are not
> considering that.
> 
> Rob Scott
> Lead Developer
> Rocket Software
> 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> Email: [email protected]
> Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of MichealButz
> Sent: 27 June 2014 16:02
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: IKJTSOxx Auth pgm cmds PC rtns
> 
> Rob,,
> 
> I can't use the TSO service facility IKJEFTSR ( I would like issue certain
> non-authorized TSO commands) because  my program is in IKJEFTSOxx
> AUTHPGM/CMD 
> 
> I know that  PC rtn's are separate entities so I am looking for the PC rtn
> to use IKJEFTSR 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Rob Scott
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 10:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: IKJTSOxx Auth pgm cmds PC rtns
> 
> Are you trying to say that you have a TSO command processor that is
> attempting to define and own a PC routine using LXRES, ETDEF, ETCRE and
> ETCON ???
> 
> Rob Scott
> Lead Developer
> Rocket Software
> 77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
> Tel: +1.781.684.2305
> Email: [email protected]
> Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Micheal Butz
> Sent: 27 June 2014 15:38
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: IKJTSOxx Auth pgm cmds PC rtns
> 
> Thanks let me get to the point
> 
> The program that creates the PC rtn
> 
> Is the AUTHCMD/PGM so I cann't use IKJEFTSR 
> 
> However I am thinking the PC rtn might be able to
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Jun 27, 2014, at 10:30 AM, John McKown 
>> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> 
>> No. If the PC routine does not require APF authorization, then the 
>> IKJTSOnn AUTH... entry isn't relevant. As an example, the STORAGE 
>> macro does a PC to do its magic, not an SVC. But a program which uses 
>> the STORAGE macro doesn't need to be in the list(s) mentioned. Only 
>> programs which are linked as AC=1 and which you want to be invoked by 
>> TSO with APF authorization active need to be listed.
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:57 AM, MichealButz <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I know if you want to run authorized code under TSO you have to place 
>>> it in IKJTSOxx AUTHCMD/PGM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> What if that code generates a PC rtn does TMP know of it
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO 
>>> IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> There is nothing more pleasant than traveling and meeting new people!
>> Genghis Khan
>> 
>> Maranatha! <><
>> John McKown
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to