Thanks for the feedback, I'll check the DB2 samplib as a starting point.

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 14, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The 110's I am not sure about.
> 
> To map the DB2 records, use
> 
> //SYSLIB        DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=DB2.DSN910.ADSNMACS (vary according to
> desired version and your site's naming conventions)
> 
> and 
> 
>         DSNDQWST DSECT=YES,SUBTYPE=ALL    Type 100                   
>         DSNDQWAS DSECT=YES,SUBTYPE=ALL    Type 101                   
>         DSNDQWSP DSECT=YES,SUBTYPE=ALL    Type 102                   
> 
> Charles
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Dno
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 7:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: IFASMFR
> 
> Hi,
> Does anyone know why you cannot map 100, 101, 102 or 110 records with this
> macro? I'd like to be able to collect a subset of the DB2 and CICS records,
> possibly by subsystem or region, or even down to a thread or transaction
> because of volume. We are not using log streams yet.
> Thanks
> Dean
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to