Whether your assessment is correct correct upon whether you are willing to make use of EJ's suggestion that you zap (presumably) the last letter of your routine's name to employ a sequence
'<stem>'.'A', '<stem>'.'B', . . . . ,'<stem>.'Z', '<stem>.'@', '<stem>.'#', '<stem>'.'$' of 29 routine names, one per test session. I'm not quite sure what Robert Rosenberg means by a 'static location', but a sequence of directed loads to tghe same reused storage obtained once dynamically would meet your needs. This whole scheme could be parameterized and automated, and if you are goingto be writing any significant quantity of code of this sort in the future the small investment required to do so would be worthwhile. (As is probably obvious, your original STORAGE OBTAIN macro instruction should be larger than life so than altered and perhaps larger successive versions of your routine will always be loadable.) John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
