In <[email protected]>, on
02/19/2014
at 04:12 PM, DASDBILL2 <[email protected]> said:
>You're right. I had forgotten about the S/360 model 67. Most of the
>360s in production were not model 67s, however. Certainly all the
>360s which I knew anything about were non-virtual 360s. The first
>virtual storage-capable processor I ever saw and touched was in 1974
>running SVS. So what was the correct term for non-virtual storage
>way back then for non-67 models of the S/360? Storage? Real
>storage? V=R storage?
Just memory or storage.
>The terms I heard most frequently included the word "core."
On any S/360 but the 360/195, memory was implemented with core
storage. The smaller S/370 processors used semiconductor memory, but
the larger models still used core until the second generation
(370/1x8).
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
