> No, I was saying, I thought, something very different. To be clear, > the execution of an AMODE(64) routine using the instructions natural > to it, is in general faster than the execution of anits AMODE(31) or, > a fortiori, AMODE(24) functional equivalent.
AMODE does not affect performance. Can you explain which instructions you think are faster than some functional equivalent, and why you think they are faster? Jim Mulder z/OS System Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie, NY ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
