A bit off the direct topic, but I have a strongly ingrained habit of
protecting my data sets in JCL explicitly. In order to do this, I actually
insert a step at the end which is an IEFBR14 which contains a DD for each
DSN which I want protected for the entire job with an explicit DISP=OLD. I
also tend to put comments in the JCL when I switch from DISP=OLD to
DISP=SHR which says something like (after the DD referencing the DSN):
//* THIS IS THE LAST STEP WHICH UPDATES ... FURTHER STEPS ONLY READ IT.

I prefer putting _good_ documentation into the actual run JCL because when
a job dies, it can be a PAIN trying to find the restart information. Is it
in a MS Word Doc file? Where? Oh, it is in CA-7 prose? Is it in a PDS?
Where? Of course, strong (and unique) standards are helpful. We like good
standards. That's why we change them all the time around here. Reminds me
of my mom:
Me: Mom, where's the ...
Mom: It's where it belongs!
Me: Where is that this week?



On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:11:45 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
> >One concern I might have is the fact some processes were set up with the
> >following philosophy
> >
> >Submit all jobs at once, and the enqueue will keep them from running
> >concurrently.  One at a time will run.
> >
> >So, if you change even one job to be able to run concurrently instead of
> >serially, it might create for some interesting events.
> >
> >This might make some companies rethink their job control processes.
> >
> If, perhaps, they allocate data sets EXC in an early step, then continue
> to update them in later steps with DISP=SHR.  Isn't the default
> DISALLOW, which provides some protection through compatibility
> with older behavior?
>
> -- gil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to