On 3 Jan 2014 12:11:21 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>(on SMF "schemas")
>
>I think that it would be useful to consider processing SMF data in other
>languages, like Perl, Python, System/R, C, etc.   If you had record schemas
>you could generate the language bindings.  Although not readily available
>on z/OS, any of these languages/tools could be run on z Linux, which also
>has the advantage moving general processor usage.

I would add COBOL since most mainframe shops already have the
compiler.  It is a royal pain to have to code the SMF30 record.

Clark Morris
>
>Kirk Wolf
>Dovetailed Technologies
>http://dovetail.com
>
>
>On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Kirk Wolf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Even better if the SMF records were uniformly described by some metadata
>> format (schema) that described the fields in the record.
>> Consider the IBM SMF record DSECTS -  one has to look at the field
>> comments to determine not only structure (e.g. triplets) but also whether
>> some C fields are really character or numeric, dates, times, etc, etc.
>>
>> Much better would be if IBM published some sort of metadata / schema,
>> perhaps in XML, that had all of the information in the DSECT, but also
>> included structure, data types, etc.    Utilities could be used to convert
>> these into record / DSECTS in assembler or HLLs.     It wouldn't have to be
>> XML  so long as there were a defined grammer, standard data types, etc.
>>
>>  If done properly so as to include comments for each field, this would
>> also cover 90% of the necessary "documentation" requirements.
>>
>> Currently, the closest thing to SMF schemas are in MXG (SAS).
>>
>>
>>
>> Kirk Wolf
>> Dovetailed Technologies
>> http://dovetail.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Currently it's kind of the worst of both worlds. Some SMF records formats
>>> are in the SMF manual. Some are in one product-specific manual or another,
>>> with no consistency from product to product. There is a cross-reference in
>>> the SMF manual, but it sometimes lags reality.
>>>
>>> Charles
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>> Behalf Of Mark Zelden
>>> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 11:09 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
>>>
>>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:35:44 -0600, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:10:15 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>Interesting thing about SMF...
>>> >>For 20 years IBM documented SMF records in one consolidated place the
>>> >>SMF manual.
>>> >>In the last 5 or so years IBM did an about face and started to scatter
>>> >>them around in unlikely  places WHY??????????????????
>>> >>
>>> >My guess would be that the specification of the formats of SMF records
>>> >is owned not by SMF, but by the various utilities that generate them.
>>> >As such, it would be onerous, untimely, perhaps even error-prone for
>>> >each utility that adds a new SMF record type to require an update of a
>>> >central SMF data areas manual section.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Oh, you mean someone would have to do some work.  :-)
>>>
>>> Seriously... I don't like the trend (although it isn't widespread).    As
>>> long there is
>>> internal communication within IBM and everyone played by the same rules,
>>> the information could be kept consolidated in a single manual or kept in
>>> sync
>>> with the component / subsystem manuals.   Same goes for operator commands
>>> (catalog / DFSMS manuals comes to mind).   There is an overall owner of
>>> z/OS,
>>> so I suppose it would be up to them to dictate direction of keeping all
>>> the information in a single manual (or not) or keeping the information
>>> current in multiple manuals (although it would come at a cost as nothing is
>>> free and these decisions
>>> are made with the financial aspects in mind).
>>>
>>> One thing's for sure - complaining on IBM-MAIN won't do anything.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
>>> ITIL v3 Foundation Certified
>>> mailto:[email protected]
>>> Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
>>> Systems Programming expert at http://search390.techtarget.com/ateExperts/
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>
>>
>>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to