Charles,
 
Thank you. First time I have run across comments about SRBs and zIIP ...man , I 
must lead a sheltered life

Scott J Ford
Software Engineer
http://www.identityforge.com/
 



On Thursday, December 12, 2013 12:46 PM, Scott Ford <[email protected]> 
wrote:
  
Peter,
I wasn't aware of Cobol SRBs violated IBM licensing. I don't mean to be 
ignorant, by why ?
Is it a security exposure as you explained or more? Sorry in advance

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
from my IPAD

'Infinite wisdom through infinite means'


On Dec 12, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:

>> It also looks like ziip and zaap usage 
>> may introduce security exposures
> 
> Usage of a zAAP or zIIP processor cannot conceivably introduce security 
> exposures.
> 
> Changing code that was written unauthorized now to run in an authorized 
> environment can. Such a change is not limited to conforming to zIIP 
> requirements.
> 
> Peter Relson
> z/OS Core Technology Design
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to