In <[email protected]>, on 12/02/2013 at 07:47 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> said:
>On Sun, 1 Dec 2013 18:04:18 -0500 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" ><[email protected]> wrote: >:>In >:><b6c1eb4364c30e47950e0f68ef65f467015...@proditmailbox1.us.syncsort.com>, >:>on 11/30/2013 >:> at 09:53 PM, "Blaicher, Christopher Y." <[email protected]> >:>said: >:> >:>>- Don't ever read data from a caller's address space when you are >:>.not in the caller's key. >:>MVCK >MVCSK MVCOS >:>>- Don't EVER, EVER write data to a caller's address space when >:>>you are not in the caller's key. >:>MVCK >MVCDK MVCOS The point being that there are half a dozen specialized instructions that do the necessary key checking without any need to be in the callers key; the particular instructions that are appropriate depend, e.g., on the environment. MVCK was just a particular counterexample, appropriate for some cases but not for others. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
