Yes, sorry Charles. I was responding to Mitch's comment about his JCL checker.
I too would be more interested in JOL. = = > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:50:30 -0800 > From: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Jol - Next Generation JCL- was JCL - What is it and what could > it be ? > To: [email protected] > > I think Mitch and JR are speaking about some JCL front-end commercial > product such as CA JCLCheck. > > I was looking for a response about JOL from its author. > > Charles > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of J R > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 10:48 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Jol - Next Generation JCL- was JCL - What is it and what could > it be ? > > So, as far as what ends up being submitted to z/OS is concerned, your > competitive product does not provide any functionality that isn't already > available with z/OS JCL? > = > = > > > > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:08:36 -0500 > > From: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Jol - Next Generation JCL- was JCL - What is it and what > could it be ? > > To: [email protected] > > > > Charles (et al): > > > > In regards to the competitive product I have been alluding to, it DOES > generate "traditional" (real) z/OS JCL. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
