I think that's a IBM question...bandwidth SDLC required more for error recovery, for example.
Scott ford www.identityforge.com from my IPAD 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means' > On Nov 9, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 9 Nov 2013 11:03:43 -0800, Jon Perryman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The "DARK SIDE" was not in reference to TCP/IP. > “Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to > an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative. -- WSG > > As far as TCP over SNA, we can easily list as negative TCP attributes (e.g. > security and timeliness). Can you imagine what SNA would have been today had > efforts remained with implementing the desirable TCP attributes into SNA.� > So, why didn't it happen? > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
