In <[email protected]>, on
11/06/2013
at 12:22 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>But why didn't they follow the same direction naming library
>macros?
No standards czar.
>And why isn't STIMER named WAIT,
Why use the name WAIT for a macro that doesn't wait?
2. If no exit routine address is specified, there is no
indication of completion except when WAIT is specified.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
