Oops, my bad. Now that you point it out I can see where it could be taken either way and I obviously took it the wrong way.
Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:38 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Linux on System z (IFL) and Spares On 31 October 2013 11:32, Pommier, Rex <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > > Are you sure about this? According to this IBM web site, the IFL runs at > full speed. He said "I think IFLs run about 10% of a full speed CP processor. So it doesn't take too much to make them cost effective." I think he meant 10% of the price, not the speed. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
