Barry Merrill wrote:

>While I support both the RACF SMF 80 records, I'm not sure they can add to the 
>data in the SMF 26 record, which contains these fields:

Yes, it is indeed so. SMF 80 is more from RACF. SMF 26 is more from JES2 side. 
Thanks for mentioning SMF 26.

I see you have listed DUPJBDLY. (SMF26IX2) First time I ever *really* see this 
field. That eye-opener will settle a little argument where one of my people 
asked why his/her job did not ran on the intended time. ;-)

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to