Charles (Chuck) Hardee said: >How do you arrive at that conclusion? >The example code moves data to the 2 bytes within the group called >UNSIGNED-PAKED-TIME-10 but never moves anything to the byte defined as FILLER. >The DIVIDE uses all 3 bytes as the numerator but the quotient is a completely >separate field so nothing is overlaid by it.
You're right. I must have overlooked the GIVING clause yesterday. My bad. >Which instruction are you thinking destroys the upper nibble of the FILLER >byte? >I just don't see it. That's because it isn't there. Sorry, Jantje. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
