On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:03:14 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote: >I think Gil is on to something here. At SHARE conferences following >announcement of the change, I got the impression that rank and file >thought it was major overkill--even killing by friendly fire--to control >product usage in this way. But the shotgun solution was mandated from on >high to appease a minuscule subset of customers upset by some local >shoot-your-foot catastrophe. It's not hard to manage. Create a RACF Group >that has appropriate access to SMP/E, then connect each legitimate user to >that group. Until someone moves in or out of the role, you're done. > Appeasing a minuscule subset of customers does not rise to the level of a "System Integrity APAR" (cf. "Boy Who Cried Wolf") unless that minuscule subset controls a disproportionate subset of revenues.
I suspect there's something more afoot. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
