1620? 1710? I don't recall a 1610

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר




________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
Doug Fuerst <d...@bkassociates.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2025 9:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Artificial stupidity in action


External Message: Use Caution


They look more like 1610's actually, but the tapes int he background are
definitely 729 drives.

Doug Fuerst



------ Original Message ------
From "Rupert Reynolds" <rreyno...@cix.co.uk>
To IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date 8/29/2025 12:21:02 PM
Subject Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Artificial stupidity in action

>My memory says 7094, although it was before my time and I can't suggest a
>source.
>
>That said,
>https://youtu.be/41U78QP8nBk?si=57nEornU6G5VjX7R says 7094 in 1961
>
>You've reminded me of The Happy Hacker, which was later and had no words I
>think. Bell Labs, maybe?
>
>Roops
>---
>"Mundus sine Caesaribus"
>
>On Fri, 29 Aug 2025, 14:52 Seymour J Metz, <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>
>>  There are conflicting claims as to the first computer to play Daisy Bell.
>>  Some sources claim 704, with a dater later than the first 7090. Other
>>  sources claim 7094, with a date earlier than the official first customer
>>  ship. Is it possible that BTL had a pre-announcement 7094? Does anyody have
>>  a definitive reference that wiki could cite?
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>  עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
>>  נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ________________________________________
>>  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf
>>  of Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu>
>>  Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 7:39 AM
>>  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>>  Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Artificial stupidity in action
>>
>>
>>  External Message: Use Caution
>>
>>
>>  It is in some regards unfortunate that the term AI is used for current
>>  software, as it properly refers to a goal not yet achieved and leads to
>>  unrealistic expectations. I prefer terms with fewer connotations, e.g., big
>>  data.
>>
>>  It is true that an LLM is simply synthesizing from the data that it was
>>  trained on, but the issue is not whether it is truly creative, but rather
>>  whether it is useful. In many cases it is, although human oversight is
>>  essential.
>>
>>  In a typical LLM application, plagiarism is not a problem unless it
>>  involves IP property violation.
>>
>>  --
>>  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>  עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
>>  נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ________________________________________
>>  From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf
>>  of Rupert Reynolds <rreyno...@cix.co.uk>
>>  Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 2:20 AM
>>  To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>>  Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Artificial stupidity in action
>>
>>
>>  External Message: Use Caution
>>
>>
>>  While I have tried various LLMs for code (such as C code to create a TCP
>>  server socket, and to accept a connection) I'd argue it is not generating
>>  to any significant degree--searching hard enough, I found the original code
>>  I'm pretty sure the LLM plagiarised.
>>
>>  LLMs do not understand (by my definition of the word). And the old trick of
>>  asking "how many Ws are there in Mississippi" would not be so no popular if
>>  they did understand.
>>
>>  Roops
>>  ---
>>  "Mundus sine Caesaribus"
>>
>>  On Fri, 29 Aug 2025, 02:35 Seymour J Metz, <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>  > I believe that current technology is good enough to generate decent HLASM
>>  > with adequate training.
>>  >
>>  > As to the future, something that I learned a long time ago is that it is
>>  a
>>  > lot easier to predict that a technology is possible than it is to predict
>>  > when. Some things arrived a lot sooner than anybody expected, while
>>  others
>>  > that were "5 years away" still aren't here after half a century.
>>  >
>>  > As for true AI, I'm more concerned about ethical issues than I am about
>>  > competition. At what point does a piece of software become a person?
>>  >
>>  > --
>>  > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>  > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>  > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
>>  > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > ________________________________________
>>  > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf
>>  > of Steve Thompson <ste...@wkyr.net>
>>  > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2025 9:07 PM
>>  > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>>  > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Artificial stupidity in action
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > External Message: Use Caution
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > I'm not so sure it has the smarts today to generate assembly
>>  > language statements that are correct and logical until we go
>>  > through another generation or two (Versions in product speak).
>>  >
>>  > I've been looking at it in reading IRS alc and trying to turn
>>  > that in to Java. I was told the java was nearly undecipherable by
>>  > the people who were well versed in java. And even then, they were
>>  > not able to make some changes to it that did what they wanted.
>>  >
>>  > Meanwhile, I'm afraid of AI becoming too "good". I keep
>>  > remembering the books I read in HS from Isaac Asimov and
>>  > postitronic brains and having to implement the rules of robotics.
>>  >
>>  > Basically, I see a bad moon rising....
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > --
>>  > Regards,
>>  > Steve Thompson
>>  >
>>  > MAGA: Make Assembly Language Great Again
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > On 8/28/2025 8:44 PM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>>  > > Just because it's overhyped doesn't mean that it's not useful. And just
>>  > because it doesn't have understanding today doesn't mean that it never
>>  > will. Making a pun on the name doesn't mean that I consider it useless or
>>  > unimportant.
>>  > >
>>  > > The issues generating HLASM code are real, but that stems from
>>  > inadequate data during training rather than design defects.
>>  > >
>>  > > --
>>  > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>  > > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>  > > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
>>  > > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > ________________________________________
>>  > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on
>>  > behalf of nmaxik...@yahoo.com <
>>  > 000008873aa64554-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
>>  > > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2025 8:09 PM
>>  > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>>  > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Artificial stupidity in action
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > External Message: Use Caution
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > The same people who said the mainframe is dead in 1993, are likely the
>>  > same ones now downplaying AI. NVIDIA is the highest market cap company
>>  that
>>  > ever existed. What do they make? Graphics Processing Units for AI data
>>  > centers. Who is buying them? The largest tech companies in the world. AI
>>  is
>>  > here and it’s going to impact everything.
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > On Sunday, August 17, 2025, 8:59 AM, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu>
>>  > wrote:
>>  > >
>>  > > How good is the training? Can it generate a working HLASM program?
>>  > Locate specific editions of PoOps?
>>  > >
>>  > > i tried CoPilot only because it was part of my mandatory training this
>>  > year. i was curious whether it would mess up as badly as ChaatGPT (It's a
>>  > typo. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.)
>>  > >
>>  > > --
>>  > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>  > > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>  > > עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
>>  > > נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > ________________________________________
>>  > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on
>>  > behalf of Pommier, Rex <00000737643a508d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
>>  > > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2025 10:49 PM
>>  > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>>  > > Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Artificial stupidity in action
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > External Message: Use Caution
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > How about the best of both worlds - google AI?  I went searching for a
>>  > very specific "can I do this" type question regarding surcharges on
>>  retail
>>  > purchases with credit cards and a specific CC clearinghouse.  Google AI
>>  > came back with a "yes you can do that" and about 3 items down the hit
>>  list,
>>  > the specific clearing house' web site pops up with "no you can't do
>>  that".
>>  > >
>>  > > Rex
>>  > >
>>  > > -----Original Message-----
>>  > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
>>  > Behalf Of Matt Hogstrom
>>  > > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 4:38 PM
>>  > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>>  > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Artificial stupidity in action
>>  > >
>>  > > Let’s be honest.  It’s not sentient.  Processed a lot of information
>>  and
>>  > indexes it to define relationships and is a better search than google.
>>  > > Apart from that I think people are expecting perfection but it is
>>  > imperfect but pretty dang impressive
>>  > >
>>  > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 17:34 Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
>>  > >
>>  > >> Well, the judge thought that submitting briefs with bogus citations
>>  > >> was pretty cheesy.
>>  > >>
>>  > >> --
>>  > >> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>>  > >>
>>https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mason.gmu.edu/*smetz3__;fg!!KjMRP1I
>>  > >> xj6eLE0Fj!o_VDCnJjynb2bLfg3a11_uUWQ7D6fOm5XPAHuwxjVSyRa1TXm8EZK0TBPkbq
>>  > >> Iq9QkXgdysUR5N9aWYQ8nUZqrh1AdEOYmjoWbmAO$
>>  > >> עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
>>  > >> נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
>>  > >>
>>  > >>
>>  > >>
>>  > >>
>>  > >> ________________________________________
>>  > >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on
>>  > >> behalf of Jeremy Nicoll <jn.ls.mfrm...@letterboxes.org>
>>  > >> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 4:58 PM
>>  > >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
>>  > >> Subject: Re: Artificial stupidity in action
>>  > >>
>>  > >>
>>  > >> External Message: Use Caution
>>  > >>
>>  > >>
>>  > >> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025, at 19:42, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>>  > >>> ... when they submitted AI-generated brie that contained
>>  > >> AI can make cheese?
>>  > >>
>>  > >> --
>>  > >> Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
>>  > >>
>>  > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>>  > >> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  > >>
>>  > >>
>>  > >>
>>  > >>
>>  > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>>  > >> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  > >>
>>  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>>  > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  > >
>>  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  >
>>  > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>  >
>>
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>  send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to