On Fri, 23 May 2025 12:50:37 +0000, Allan Staller wrote: > >It is (usually) not required for SMPE to be run under UID(0). However, as you >have observed, it can cause problems with directory permissions. > If such problems occur with IBM products, it would be a good Idea to fix them.
>-----Original Message----- >From: I David Spiegel >Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2025 4:59 PM > > s it absolutely necessary for SysProgs running SMP/e Jobs with USS > Maintenance to have UID(0)? >One reason I can think of is that the new files need to be owned by >UID(0)/GID(0). Another is that since "System" Directories (e.g. /usr) are >owned by UID(0)/GID(0), the new files cannot be placed there due to the >existing permission bits.) > >Please confirm/deny my reasoning. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
