2042? Isn't that a generic *ix problm? Or am I thinking of the wrong overflow.
I feel confidant that by 2042 we'll be using ETOD and 64-bit time_t structures, but that we'll find new ways to paint ourselves into a corner. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Phil Smith III Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 3:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What has IBM ever done for us? (probably more than I know) External Message: Use Caution Nah, that wasn't IBM's fault per se. Now, the 2042 problem might be considered their fault, but they've given us a fix for that... -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Colin Paice Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 3:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: What has IBM ever done for us? (probably more than I know) Year 2k problem ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
