Strain the sewer lines out of the pentagon for the little pills
CIT | Ken Porowski | VP Mainframe Engineering | Information Technology | +1 973 740 5459 (tel) | [email protected] This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary, privileged and confidential information of CIT Group Inc. or its subsidiaries or affiliates (collectively, "CIT"), and are intended solely for the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any use, disclosure, printing, copying or distribution, or reliance on the contents, of this communication is strictly prohibited. CIT disclaims any liability for the review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or the taking of any action in reliance upon, this communication by persons other than the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender advising of the error in transmission, and immediately delete and destroy the communication and any accompanying materials. To the extent permitted by applicable law, CIT and others may inspect, review, monitor, analyze, copy, record and retain any communications sent from or received at this email address. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Check out Moto X: Motorola reveals plans for ink and even pills to replace AL On 06/04/2013 01:02 PM, Ed Finnell wrote: > _Moto X: Motorola reveals plans for ink and even pills to replace ALL > your passwords | Mail Online_ > (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2333203/Moto-X-Motorol > a-reveals-plans-ink-pills-replace-ALL-passwords.html?ito > =feeds-newsxml) > > When was it T.J. Watson got in so much trouble wanting to tattoo > everybody for authentication purposes? > > ... If the final verdict has not yet been reached on whether or not there is any increased health risk from having a cell-phone transmitter next to your head for prolonged periods, the idea of having a permanent RF transmitter internally or attached to my body doesn't sound that appealing. Sounds like it would also mean someone forceably detained could be impersonated easily without their need to cooperate (or even be conscious or alive?). I still see a need for authentication to require something only known by the individual, not solely based on something they possess. -- Joel C. Ewing, Bentonville, AR [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
