I forgot to add, the VPS PROC has REGION=0M.  The JES2 STC JOBCLASS has 
REGION=4M.
When I ran VPS as a batch job, I had REGION=0M coded on my job statement.  Does
anyone know if the JES2 STC JOBCLASS REGION would override what is coded on the 
EXEC
statement of a STC?

I will dig around and see if I have any programs that report on SMF type 30 
records.
I would need something that would show region statistics.  Perhaps, that would 
show
VPS region usage over the last couple of months.



"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."

Bugs Bunny

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Tuesday, January 28th, 2025 at 7:22 AM, rpinion865 
<0000042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:

> Since I am the z/OS system programmer, I can say with 99% confidence, nothing 
> has changed.
> But I have learned the hard way, never say never. I did not make any parmlib 
> or JES2 parm
> changes. As for the IPL, it was the scheduled monthly IPL (not my decision, 
> that is
> way it has been for many, many years, predating my start date of May 2022).
> 
> LRS had us run a GTF trace and send them the output. After analyzing the GTF 
> trace and
> VPS logs, they suggested we remove printer definitions for printers that were 
> no longer
> present. Again, this company has a bad habit of maintaining pre-historic 
> artifacts.
> After the dead printers were removed, VPS, as a STC, came up and is stable.
> 
> 
> 
> "Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."
> 
> Bugs Bunny
> 
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, January 28th, 2025 at 1:55 AM, Brian Westerman 
> 000006ba4ed225c9-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
> 
> > Someone could have changed the location of some control blocks in parmlib 
> > and now they are in 64bit areas. Or someone could have added the TIOT 
> > constraint relief stuff or any of several other "minor" parm changes that 
> > upset where VPS is able to touch things. It could also be that the VPS 
> > software itself was changed with some maintenance.
> > 
> > Since it's a STC vs JOB thing, then it could be that someone made a change 
> > to the JES2PARMS and moved some of the constraint relief stuff around. 
> > Probably SWA.
> > 
> > The good news is that VPS can run as a batch job without any reall issues, 
> > but you do need to make sure that you code TIME=1440 on the execute card or 
> > jobcard.
> > 
> > The A03 is probably because one of the internal VPS tasks has abended 
> > before it detached it's subtasks. The S0C4 will probably be pointing to 
> > some area above the line or the 64bit line and your program is likely 
> > either 24bit and can't see the 31 bot area or 31bit and cant see the 64bit 
> > area.
> > 
> > So, you can run as a batch job for a while, but you need to run down the 
> > changes to parmlib (could be DIAGxx), or JES2parms to see what they changed.
> > 
> > Nobody IPLs just for the fun of it so someone cahnged something. If it's 
> > been a while since the last one then lots of stuff could have changed.
> > 
> > If you can't find the culprit, then restore your res volume from a previous 
> > point in time (like from your previous IPL time) and you will likely see 
> > that things run just fine, then you will need to compare the parmlibs to 
> > see what changed. If it's a VPS change, then look at the last update date 
> > on your VPS loadlibs, if thoe dates are before the previous IPL, (the one 
> > where things still worked) then the problem is outside VPS and you need to 
> > track down the varmint that changed stuff on the res pack on you.
> > 
> > You might be able to find the culprit just by looking at what has changed 
> > since the previous IPL in parmlib by looking at the dates on the members.
> > 
> > Remember, if everyone says "nobody changed nothin", then someone is not 
> > telling the truth. Something changed, software doesn't just break for no 
> > reason.
> > 
> > The first thing that should tip you off that something changed was the fact 
> > that you IPLed. There must have been a reason, and maybe someone thought to 
> > slip some other changes in on you.
> > 
> > Look closely, you'll find it.
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to