On Tue, 28 May 2013 17:34:17 +0000, Pommier, Rex R. wrote: >That's just where I was going in my thinking. It looks like something is >defined as a 3380. 3380 track is 83% of capacity of 3390, and his initial >allocation of 654 tracks is suspiciously close to 83% of his other 2 >allocations of 780 tracks. > And this is why IBM (I believe) among coloro che sanno, recommends allocating in bytes rather than geometry-sensitive units such as tracks or cylinders. Good advice to follow, IMO.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
