On what release was it flagged and on what release was it not flagged? I would consider it a bug if it was not flagged.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Steve Thompson <ste...@wkyr.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2024 5:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Question on HLASM - B to a DROP statement!?! Caution: This email did not originate from George Mason’s mail system. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Yes the subject is correct. I just ran into this situation. Program is in production. Multiple points in this program do the following: B DROPR11 Now, a few screens away we have this: DROPR11 DROP R11 LA R1,xxxxx (or something similar) The DROPR11 above gets flagged with an invalid label The various B DROPR11 statements resolve to the LA R1xxxx Anyone see a problem with this? When did this kind of thing get accepted? I would have figured that invalid label would have gotten at least an RC=8 And every one of those "Branch" instructions would have been flagged for an undefined label or some such. An inquiring mind would like to know. Regards, Steve Thompson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
