On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:40:45 +0300, Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> wrote:
>"FORCE - For the SETSSI DELETE command, a required parameter that specifies >that the subsystem is to be removed. This command should be used with care, as >removing a subsystem may result in loss of system function." > >One wonders what the "loss of system function" is. > >That is why I advised changing on letter to something that wouldn't be in a >real subsystem. That way the hash function will still pass thru it but not >match. > >Of course, the function codes in the SSVT should be disabled. The "loss of system function" isn't referring to subsystem name hashing (and the SETSSI DELETE command should take care of that kind of cleanup anyway). That statement is really referring to whatever function the subsystem provides - so if you delete some really important subsystem that you need to run the system, you might not have a usable system anymore. Also, not every subsystem supports being added dynamically, so if you delete one of those subsystems, you're out of luck. Scott Ballentine (sbal...@us.ibm.com) z/OS MVS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
