Thanks Gil ________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of Paul Gilmartin <0000042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 9:25:07 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> Subject: Re: TELNET PROFILE, strictly PDS?
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:29:59 +0000, roscoe5 wrote: >I could not find definitive doc saying a PDS/E was/wasn’t allowed, but I am >convinced it is. Thanks. > In days of yore there were only PDSs Nowadays there are PDS, PDSE1, PDSE2, and UNIX directories with some similarities and many differences listed in: <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/3.1.0?topic=processing-pdss-pdses-unix-directories> Must it be the responsibility of every facility to enumerate its capabilities? With great power comes great responsibility. Long ago, I learned that UNIX directories were handled well by HLASM after IBM fixed a couple of my APARs. Poorly if at all as Rexx SYSEXEC, with no documented restriction. Will a future PDSE3 change more rules? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
