On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:57:53 +0000 Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote:
:>But none of this is appropriate to do within a recovery routine. That is why there is an SDWA. :>And if the system was unable to provide the ESTAE-type recovery routine with an SDWA, then too bad (and encourage the creator to use SDWALOC31=YES (as is the case always for such recovery as ESTAEX and ARR). Are you implying that an ESTAE(X) routine with SSWALOC=31 is guaranteed an SDWA and there is no reason to check R0 for 12 and alternate code paths? -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
