I have removed the ethernet word on link statement. And it works ! Thanks !
What would be the impact if i start a z/os and a z/vm test environnement ? Ethernet word will not be required ? Resiliency Services on Z Mainframe alain.benveni...@kyndryl.com > Le 4 janv. 2024 à 15:49, Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com> a écrit : > > On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:04:54 -0600, Alain Benvéniste <a.benveni...@free.fr> > wrote: >> I had a z/OS (10.1.106.201) under a z/VM(10.1.106.200) speaking to each >> other through CTC, and it worked. >> Now I want them to speak to each other through a unique OSA card as lpars. >> it works but sporadically. >> Each one can ping my PC(10.1.106.250). > > It sounds like MAC address confusion of some sort, seen when two hosts have > the same IP address or when the external routers are confused. If you have > dynamic routing, make sure those configuration reflect the direct connections > instead of routing override pointing to CTC. > > When it is misbehaving, you need to see what the routers are telling you > about both systems. It feels like there's a static route stuck somewhere. > "Sporadic" is the clue. > > For fun, try removing the "ETHERNET" keyword from the z/VM LINK statement. > It's ok to mix IP and ETHERNET mode traffic on the same OSA, but it's > possible there is some kind of issue with the MAC address that VM is using > because of ETHERNET mode. (It gets a new MAC address from the OSA.) > > Alan Altmark > IBM > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
