On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:57:00 -0500, Bob Bridges wrote: >Oh, simply because the whole job is 160-something lines. One inserted '//' is >a lot less risky than editing that many records, that's all. > And it's more readily reversible if you want to restore the original job after experimenting and choosing the preferred refactoring of STEP1.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
