On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:13:27 +0000, Farley, Peter wrote:

>Probably preserved for IBM (pick your language) PROC compatibility. The only 
>place I have ever seen temporary link libraries used is in IBM-supplied 
>compile-link-go PROC’s, where the link step SYSLMOD DD uses 
>DSN=&&GOSET(&MEM) and the GO step uses “PGM=*.linkstepname.SYSLMOD”.  I’ve 
>never seen that JCL paradigm used in a production job anywhere.
>
I fear I rook my inspiration from those PROCLIB members.  And I ignored the 
maxim,
"Don't take IBM's defaults as IBM's recommendations."

And I was astonished at the generated DDNAMEs I saw in allocation messages.

>If performance needs to be improved, there is always the option to copy the 
>program objects needed from the resident PDSE to a Unix directory in the PATH.
>
"cp" cam move program objects.  Can I then invoke them with LINKMVS and/or
pass the classic R1 PLIST for compatibility with batch JCL?

(I wish I could //SrEPLIB DD  PATH=... to avoid synching copies.)


On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 12:53:32 -0600, Jon Perryman  wrote:
>    ...
>Temporary datasets never use VOL=SER=. They are accessed through a DD that 
>optionally exists for the life of the job (DDNAME= or DSN=&&XXX). 
>Technically they are uncatalogued but the word uncatalogued implies use of 
>VOL=SER=,  
>
But they can use VOL=REF, which is sometimes needed.

-- 
gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to