Paul Gilmartin wrote: >Put the mainstream JCL in that same JCLLIB and invoke it with a stub/wrapper >INCLUDE. >(Can INCLUDEs be nested?) >(I've done similar with Assembler using a script to generate a SYSIN >consisting of only >a single COPY statement.)
Sorry, I'm not grokking this. I have a library that includes the "real" JCL and the member with the SET statements. Then I put a third stub in that library that does an INCLUDE of both. Doesn't that stub need the same tailoring, to name the library? If so, what am I gaining? >It's dismaying that JCL and many other IBM products provide no way of >explicitly >asserting a default value.<snip> I think you're agreeing with me that there's no workaround? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
