I would consider a person who claims to know what another knows, absent 
evidence, to be in that category. Ad hominem arguments have no place here.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
David Crayford [dcrayf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 8:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Strange results for the PS1 prompt with z/OS Unix

While maintaining respect, it can be quite exasperating within a
technical forum to come across a "pseudo-expert" or a "know-it-all."
It's important to possess a solid grasp of the subject, as otherwise,
your contributions might just add to the noise. z/OS UNIX might not be
within your realm of expertise.

Enough said from me on this subject :)

On 18/8/2023 8:31 pm, Seymour J Metz wrote:

>> I'm feeling a bit puzzled here!
> Then ask instead of attributing to me things that I didn't write.
>
>> Bash doesn't come pre-installed with z/OS;
> True but irrelevant. Now, were Rocket to stop supporting it, *that* would be 
> relevant.
>
>> so there shouldn't be any compatibility problems, right?
> WTF? How does the fact that it's 3rd party suddenly make bash and zsh 
> compatible?
>
>> If IBM decides to include zsh, which is
>> considered superior to bash, this could be a game-changer.
> Only for new scripts.
>
>> Once IBM introduced their Python SDK for z/OS, Rocket's Python started
>> struggling and eventually became obsolete.
> True but irrelevant; those were two implementations of the same language, 
> while bash and zsh are different languages.
>
>> It's perfectly fine to skip commenting on every discussion,
> It's perfectly fine to comment on what people actually write; it's not so 
> fine to comment on what only exists in your head.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
> David Crayford [dcrayf...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 7:33 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Strange results for the PS1 prompt with z/OS Unix
>
> On 18/8/2023 7:07 pm, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> While, IMHO, zsh should have been included in MVS/ESA SP V4.3 OpenEdition, I 
>> don't see it killing bash, due to compatibility.
> I'm feeling a bit puzzled here! Bash doesn't come pre-installed with
> z/OS; rather, it's a tool ported by Rocket, so there shouldn't be any
> compatibility problems, right? If IBM decides to include zsh, which is
> considered superior to bash, this could be a game-changer.
>
> Once IBM introduced their Python SDK for z/OS, Rocket's Python started
> struggling and eventually became obsolete.
>
> It's perfectly fine to skip commenting on every discussion, especially
> when it's not within your field of expertise.
>
>>
>> --
>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of 
>> David Crayford [dcrayf...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 5:38 AM
>> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Strange results for the PS1 prompt with z/OS Unix
>>
>> What version of bash are you using? Rocket software's port or IBM z/OS
>> Open Tools?
>>
>> Irrespective, bash is an enhanced ASCII application so make sure you
>> have the following environment variables set in your profile login
>> scripts by entering "env | sort" from the shell command line.
>>
>> _BPXK_AUTOCVT=ON
>> _CEE_RUNOPTS=FILETAG(AUTOCVT,AUTOTAG) TERMTHDACT(UADUMP) ABTERMENC(ABEND)
>> _TAG_REDIR_ERR=txt
>> _TAG_REDIR_IN=txt
>> _TAG_REDIR_OUT=txt
>>
>> Incidentally, I noticed that IBM are shipping zsh as part of z/OS 3.1 so
>> bye, bye bash.
>>
>> I've being using zsh for years and it turbo charges the shell. For
>> example, there are open source themes such as oh-my-zsh and
>> powerline10k. The powerline customizes PS1 with fancy glyphs. The
>> current Git branch, commits and other information is shown. It's next
>> level to the dull one your using :). Also, there is zsh-autosuggestions
>> which recalls previous commands for auto completion. oh-my-zsh also
>> provides a plugin for git command completion and other super cool
>> command completions that make using the shell as easy as an IDE.
>>
>> https://github.com/ohmyzsh/ohmyzsh/tree/master
>> https://github.com/romkatv/powerlevel10k
>> https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions
>>
>> To enable the cool glyphs you will need to install Nerd fonts and
>> configure your terminal emulator. If you're a Windows user and using
>> PuTTY I recommend switching to Windows Terminial (preferably with WSL2)
>> which has tabs, tiled windows and is just miles better. If you're on a
>> Mac like me it's easy to configure Termimal, iTerm2 or whatever emulator
>> you use. Same with Linux desktops. On z/OS "export TERM=xterm-256color"
>>
>> In the meantime, there is a port of powerline-go as part of the Z/OS
>> Open Tools project. If you have downloaded the installer you can install
>> it simply by running "zopen install powerlinegoport".
>>
>> https://github.com/justjanne/powerline-go    # instructions how to
>> configure it with bash
>>
>> *Z Shell (Zsh) on z/OS*
>>
>> The Z Shell (Zsh), specifically Zsh 5.8.1, has been ported and made
>> available on z/OS 3.1. Zsh is a UNIX command interpreter that is used as
>> an interactive login shell and as a shell script command processor. It
>> has command-line editing, built-in spelling correction, programmable
>> command completion, shell functions (with autoloading), a history
>> mechanism, and a host of other features. With the extensibility, rich
>> customization, and advanced features, Zsh provides a modern and powerful
>> shell on z/OS. It is designed to accelerate users' daily work and have
>> consistent behavior with other open platforms.
>>
>> On 17/8/2023 11:31 pm, Tom Longfellow wrote:
>>> I am confused and am throwing out a Hail Mary for help.   Here is the 
>>> situation.
>>> Two cloned LPARs.  (same sysres and unix root file systems)
>>>
>>> On system 1 - the /etc/profile   has a PS1 of
>>>        export PS1="[\\u@\\H \\W \\@]\\$ "
>>>
>>> On system 2 - the /etc/profile  has a PS1 of
>>>       export PS1="[\\u@\\H \\W \\@]\\$ "
>>>
>>> Why YES they do look the same... at least they do to me.
>>> -=-=-=
>>> The results however are very different.
>>>
>>> On system one the displayed PS1 is
>>>       [TECH905@jismvs_test ~ 11:26 AM]$
>>>
>>> On system two the displayed PS1 is
>>>      [\u@\H \W \@]$
>>> -=-=-=-=
>>> I am using the same SHELL program in my environment.  (/usr/bin/bash)
>>>
>>> Anybody have any ideas why the two different LPARs are reading the same 
>>> string but interpreting it in two different ways?
>>> My suspect is some dark secret settings in the Unix file system.   Total 
>>> Guess
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send emailtolists...@listserv.ua.edu   with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu  with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email tolists...@listserv.ua.edu  with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to