On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 09:43:38 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote:

>On 7/31/23 8:06 AM, Rick Troth wrote:
>> per-user automount does not necessarily waste space
>
>IMHO automount is completely independent of shared / separate per user
>disk space.
>
>> The thing which is mounted might be a sub-directory of a shared space.
>
>Agreed.
> 
Wasn't true in the Bad Old Days, when the only thing that could be mounted
was an entire HFS content (or an NFS [sub]directory.)

And I was dismayed that the MVS mount maps needed to differ between
MVS NFS server and client.  Solaris was smarter: mount on the server
would look at the map, say, "Oh! That's me!" and mount the directory as local.

-- 
gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to