Timothy Sipples wrote: >I must take issue with the "BIPS" measurement and the cross-architecture >comparisons presented in this discussion. They're extremely misleading at >best. "MIPS" and "BIPS" are perilous enough within zEnterprise capacity >estimations, but they go haywire rapidly when carried elsewhere.
Hmmm, I note your comment, but I want to give you some TIPS, what about TIPS? (Terabyte Instructions per Seconds) Is that perilous enough? ;-D Back to square one where k, kibi and friends reside... ;-D <shields and phasers up while running back to hide under my rock> ;-) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
