I recreated the abnormality on our sandbox sysplex and activated the updated
CFRM policy there. I looked at the maintenance level of IXCMIAPU and the only
PTF applied is UJ09036. The other modules have no IDR data other than base code.
IXC360I 05.39.31 DISPLAY XCF 180
STRNAME: MJMJ_GBP22
STATUS: NOT ALLOCATED
POLICY INFORMATION:
POLICY SIZE : 300032 K
POLICY INITSIZE: 153600 K
POLICY MINSIZE : 115200 K
FULLTHRESHOLD : 80
ALLOWAUTOALT : YES
REBUILD PERCENT: 1
DUPLEX : DISABLED
ALLOWREALLOCATE: YES
PREFERENCE LIST: CFBHP CFAHP
ENFORCEORDER : NO
EXCLUSION LIST IS EMPTY
187 STRUCTURE NAME(MJMJ_GBP22) INITSIZE(150M) SIZE(293M)
188 PREFLIST(CFBHP,CFAHP) REBUILDPERCENT(1) ALLOWAUTOALT(YES)
ADMINISTRATIVE DATA UTILITY: MESSAGES DATA TYPE = CFRM
______________________________________________________________________________
IXC738I DEFINE POLICY (CFRMPOL) STATEMENT AT LINE 4 PASSED
VERIFICATION. THE POLICY CAN BE REPLACED.
IXC739I DATA WAS CHANGED FOR COUPLE DATA TYPE CFRM
DEFINE POLICY NAME(CFRMPOL)
/* Defined: 07/05/2023 05:37:29.897192 User: A2MJAET */
/* Version: 0 */
/* 53 Structures defined in this policy */
/* 2 Coupling Facilities defined in this policy */
STRUCTURE NAME(MJMJ_GBP22) SIZE(300032K)
INITSIZE(153600K)
ALLOWAUTOALT(YES)
REBUILDPERCENT(1)
PREFLIST(CFBHP, CFAHP)
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected]
------- Original Message -------
On Friday, June 30th, 2023 at 1:22 PM, Bill Neiman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> I ran an IXCMIAPU job with your input, but could not recreate the behavior
> you're seeing. The report section of the output reports the sizes as they
> were input, with units of M. So now I have to ask the "Are you sure it's
> plugged in?" questions. I apologize in advance for these:
>
> o Are you looking at the report for the same administrative policy you
> updated?
>
> o On what release did you run the utility?
>
> o Did you STEPLIB to some other version of IXCMIAPU?
>
> o Did you start the new policy? If so, does a D XCF,STR,STRNAME=R901_GBP22
> command show the same results as the utility?
>
> Bill Neiman
> z/OS Parallel Sysplex development
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:48:59 +0000, Mark Jacobs [email protected]
> wrote:
>
> > 718 STRUCTURE NAME(R901_GBP22) INITSIZE(150M) SIZE(293M)
> > 719 PREFLIST(CFANB,CFBNB) REBUILDPERCENT(1) ALLOWAUTOALT(YES)
> >
> > ADMINISTRATIVE DATA UTILITY: MESSAGES DATA TYPE = CFRM
> > ___________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > IXC738I DEFINE POLICY (CFRMMJ) STATEMENT AT LINE 3 PASSED
> > VERIFICATION. THE POLICY CAN BE ADDED.
> >
> > IXC739I DATA WAS CHANGED FOR COUPLE DATA TYPE CFRM
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ADMINISTRATIVE DATA UTILITY: REPORT DATA TYPE = CFRM
> >
> > STRUCTURE NAME(R901_GBP22) SIZE(300032K)
> > INITSIZE(153600K)
> > ALLOWAUTOALT(YES)
> > REBUILDPERCENT(1)
> > PREFLIST(CFANB, CFBNB)
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Thanks. Mark Jacobs
> >
> > Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
> >
> > GPG Public Key -
> > https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&[email protected]
> >
> > ------- Original Message -------
> > On Thursday, June 29th, 2023 at 8:27 AM, Bill Neiman [email protected]
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Mark,
> > >
> > > If you can supply an example of the input (CFRM policy) and output
> > > (IXCMIAPU report) for one of the structures that provides output in units
> > > of K instead of M, I'll take a look.
> > >
> > > Bill Neiman
> > > IBM Parallel Sysplex Development
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
