I would still keep it in an additional library in the concatenation. Not the 
one that IBM maintains via SMP/E

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
> Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 9:33 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: REXXLIB execs naming
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> 
> Hi:
> From IBM documentation, regarding System REXX configuration:
> <<<<<The parmlib member AXRnn provides the user with the ability to specify
> a set (concatenation) of data sets from which SYSREXX attempts to fetch
> execs. This set of data sets is referred to as the REXXLIB concatenation.
> SYS1.SAXREXEC contains execs that IBM provides and in general should not be
> modified. When SYS1.SAXREXEC is not specified in the REXXLIB concatenation,
> it is appended to the end. For details about AXRnn processing, see z/OS MVS
> Initialization and Tuning Reference. Any execs that are added to the
> concatenation cannot start with the letters A through I that are reserved for
> IBM execs.>>>> I wonder about LAST phrase of the paragraph...
> We have added a library to REXXLIB concatenation, and a REXX exec starting
> with I (it is indeed a REXX called IRRPWREX, programmed by Bruce Wells from
> IBM, but not officially supported by IBM). Everything is working fine. Do we
> have to understand the phrase just as a recommendation, in order to not
> interfere with REXX execs that IBM ships in SYS1.SAXREXEC?
> Thanks in advance for your help,
> Juan Mautalen
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to