Thank you for that link Ann, but I quote from the page you sent:

"You will not receive a direct response to your feedback."

Why not?  Wouldn't a mechanism to engage in dialog about the documentation 
error(s)/omission(s) be far more customer-friendly and responsive to customer 
perceptions?

Surely the volume of documentation suggestions/comments is not large enough 
(even world-wide) for it to be cost-prohibitive for IBM to provide a dialog 
mechanism of some kind and a team that responds in dialog with the customer, 
even if it is only a simple message board.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Ann 
DePaolo
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Documentation RCF entry and tracking proposal on idea portal - 
please read and vote

Hello Peter,

For information on how to leave feedback for IBM product documentation, visit: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/about?topic=how-provide-feedback__;!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!MQTQaSBasGKRH1dMI40r-PHLzY7IKeOeAUqwQMNodxrx9x6Y09h-ASEYtfWkDUG8YCzmgwz8rrHe-_RD0w$
 .

Thank you,
Ann DePaolo
--


This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to