I have certainly known people to rely on this "trick" to assure sequential execution.
Charles Composed on a mobile: please excuse my brevity retired mainframer <[email protected]> wrote: >:>: -----Original Message----- >:>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >:>: Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick >:>: Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 10:41 AM >:>: To: [email protected] >:>: Subject: Re: Check whether job still running >:>: >:>: Why are people so insistent that having two same named jobs running at >:>: the same time would cause such havoc?� Do people really often have two >:>: jobs with the same name that do different things submitted at the same >:>: time with the intention that they need to run sequentially and not >:>: simultaneously? > >Speaking only for my shop, ABSOTIVELY POSILUTELY AND EMPHATICALLY YES!!! > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
