Doh, I of course meant -qasm not -dasm.
From: Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com> Sent: Monday, May 1, 2023 5:02 PM To: ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu; IBM Mainframe Assembler List (assembler-l...@listserv.uga.edu) <assembler-l...@listserv.uga.edu> Subject: XLC inline assembler question (Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and the assembler list) When compiling C programs with XLC, you need to specify the -dasm flag to have inline assembler code recognized as such. I can see PoE arguments for requiring that option; what isn't clear is whether there's any downside to it beyond the unlikely case that you decide to have a function of your own named asm or __asm or __asm__. Is there? We'd rather just use it all the time, rather than trying to keep track of which modules have inline assembler and which don't, but not if it's going to cost significant performance at compile time or something. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
