Are you talking about a scenario where you can't reproduce the ABEND in the recopmiled version? If not, why do you want the old symbol table, etc.?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Tom Marchant [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 2:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LE runtime Yes, it will. And if you are debugging an abend that occurred with an older version of the program, the listing is no longer available in the program object. -- Tom Marchant On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 18:33:18 +0000, Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote: >Won't that replace the NOLOAD segments with the new ones? > > >-- >Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > >________________________________________ >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of >Tom Marchant [[email protected]] >Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 2:31 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: LE runtime > >Until the program is recompiled and relinked. > >-- >Tom Marchant > >On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 10:48:04 -0700, Tom Ross <[email protected]> >wrote: > >>With the >>NOLOAD class program segmenets in new COBOL the debugging data is always >>available, always in sync ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
