Also, "*k = x + y".
________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of
Frank Swarbrick <frank.swarbr...@outlook.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2023 5:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Subject: Re: ASM call by value
I'm guessing he meant "int *k" rather than "&int k".
________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <0000042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2023 5:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Subject: Re: ASM call by value
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 19:35:59 -0400, Steve Smith wrote:
>I forgot to mention, to pass by value with CALL, you need [a] register[s].
>e.g.:
>void foo(int i, int j , &int k)
> {
> k = i + j;
> }
>
That shouldn't be legal. In fact, gcc gives me:
cc tinyc.c -o tinyc
tinyc.c:3:25: error: expected parameter declarator
void foo(int i, int j , &int k)
--
gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
