Re: greater than 256 channels. I vaguely remember it was the top end of Amdahl 
5995Ms which could have 512 channels. In order to use these the system had to 
be partitioned in 2 (not using MDF?) with a max of 256 channels in each.

Re CF links, Hitachi were known to licence the IP for some System z functions. 
Maybe they did this for the links.

Sent from Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of 
Radoslaw Skorupka <00000471ebeac275-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2023 3:34:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Subject: CF links and non-IBM machines (historical)

I'm aware it is quite obsolete topic.
Q: was it possible to connect Amdahl or Hitachi machines with IBM CPC
using sysplex links?
Did they use the same hardware and protocol?

BTW: I found the following Hitachi CF link descriptions: ISCH2, ICF,
ISB, ICC. Any of them is similar to IBM links (I know IBM channels, its
names, etc.)
Any clue?

Another question: I found some non-IBM machines offered over 256
channels. How???
Note, it was definitely before XMP machines (multiple CSS).

--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to