My primary use was to pause a few things at IPL so that needed services had a 
chance to start.

In this case, the OP seemed to have a system where holding an init wouldn't 
hurt much

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2023 7:50 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Scheduling a job to run after a delay
> 
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> 
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:39:51 +0000, Gibney, Dave  wrote:
> 
> >A different approach is to add a additional step at or near the top that 
> >waits.
> I had a very short assembler program that called STIMER based on parm
> input.
> >
> Ah!  the old way.  Nowadays, BPXBATCH  sleep.
> 
> In those days, it was considered discourteous to bogart an initiator; thus
> "sleep" commands were rare.
> 
> --
> gil
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to